This project was developed as part of an initiative to optimize the management of legal proceedings in administrative environments. The proposal involved the creation of two complementary interfaces: a management panel for case tracking and an interface for adding proceedings focused on the detailed recording of legal information.
The goal was to offer an intuitive, functional, and visually clear solution for professionals who deal with large volumes of legal data on a daily basis, such as analysts, technicians, and magistrates.
Challenges
Organize complex information in an accessible and navigable way
Ensure visual and semantic consistency across different screens
Create a fluid experience for users with varying levels of familiarity with legal systems
Prioritize mandatory fields without overwhelming the user with excessive data
Management Panel: Developed with a focus on clarity and quick filtering. The table displays essential columns such as case number, type, judge responsible, status, and deadline. Navigation between pages and advanced filters allows for efficient and targeted searches.
Inclusion Interface: Structured in progressive sections, with fields grouped by relevance (case data, parties involved, attorneys, etc.). Action buttons such as “Preview template” and “Save draft” have been included to give users flexibility.
Accessibility and responsiveness: The interfaces were designed to work well across different resolutions and devices, with adequate contrast and clear visual hierarchy.
Results
The project was delivered on time and served as a basis for future improvements to the system. The screens were well received by internal users, who highlighted the organization of information and ease of navigation.
Documentation and Handoff
In addition to interface design, I developed comprehensive documentation for handoff, with the goal of ensuring a smooth transition between design and development. This material includes:
Component guide: visual and functional details of each interface element—buttons, fields, tables, filters, etc.
Spacing and grid specifications: precise measurements between elements, margins, paddings, and alignments, respecting the visual hierarchy logic.
Interaction states: examples of states such as hover, focus, fill, error, and success.
Navigation flow: mapping of interactions between screens and possible paths within the system.
This delivery was designed to facilitate the work of the development team, reduce rework, and ensure that the final product respects design decisions. Even in contexts where this type of documentation is not required, I believe it is essential to maintain the quality and consistency of the project.
*Note
For confidentiality reasons, the data shown on the screens has been modified and logos removed. The focus of this case study is to demonstrate the design process and the logic behind the decisions made.